Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education

Responsibility, Ethics, and Power

Statement 12 of 30

Academic judgement is augmented, not automated.

Why this matters

GenAI can illuminate patterns, generate ideas, and offer feedback - but discernment remains the domain of educators. Algorithms may assist, but they do not assess. Human context, empathy, and fairness are not optional; they are the foundation of academic decision-making.

A question for reflection

Which parts of assessment should never be delegated to an algorithm, and why?

Share your view on this statement

The conversation so far

Loading…

Cite this statement
Farrell, H. & McCarthy, K. (2025). Statement 12: "Academic judgement is augmented, not automated." Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education. GenAI:N3. https://manifesto.genain3.ie/12/